Relativistic Ethics


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Topanga Talk ]


Posted by goose, meet gander on 08:54:13 04/28/08

Gee, and all this time I thought it was us libruls who were sposed to be the bad guys for not having an absolute sense of morals and ethics. So much for that hogwash.

The Justice Department has told Congress that American intelligence operatives attempting to thwart terrorist attacks can legally use interrogation methods that might otherwise be prohibited under international law....
While the Geneva Conventions prohibit "outrages upon personal dignity," a letter sent by the Justice Department to Congress on March 5 makes clear that the administration has not drawn a precise line in deciding which interrogation methods would violate that standard, and is reserving the right to make case-by-case judgments.

"The fact that an act is undertaken to prevent a threatened terrorist attack, rather than for the purpose of humiliation or abuse, would be relevant to a reasonable observer in measuring the outrageousness of the act," said Brian A. Benczkowski, a deputy assistant attorney general, in the letter, which had not previously been made public....

In one letter written Sept. 27, 2007, Mr. Benczkowski argued that "to rise to the level of an outrage" and thus be prohibited under the Geneva Conventions, conduct "must be so deplorable that the reasonable observer would recognize it as something that should be universally condemned."



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Topanga Talk ]